Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 13.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Oct 1;111(2):166–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.009

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics by annual surgeon volume based on a cohort of California women who underwent ovarian cancer resection from 1991–2002

Variable High-volume surgeon
(HVS) (N=3249)
Middle-volume surgeon
(MVS) (N=4104)
Low-volume surgeon
(LVS) (N=5833)
P value
Patient demographics
Age (years)
Mean±standard deviation 58.4±14.7 59.0±14.6 56.6±16.3 <0.001a
Race/ethnicity (%) <0.001
  Non-Hispanic White 77.5 71.5 69.7
  Black 2.8 4.1 4.0
  Hispanic 12.5 16.4 18.1
  Asian 6.9 7.6 7.8
  Other 0.3 0.4 0.4 <0.001
Payer (%)
  Private 60.6 54.3 51.5
  Medicare 20.4 22.8 21.0
  Medicaid 4.7 6.6 5.6
  Uninsured 2.5 2.0 2.1
  Other 11.8 14.3 19.8
% <200% poverty level
Mean±standard deviation 28.8±17.7 29.3±18.2 28.8±18.1 0.500 a
Medical comorbid disease
Revised Charlson <0.001
 Comorbidity Index (%)
  Charlson 0 80.3 78.4 81.9
  Charlson 1 14.4 15.1 12.5
  Charlson 2+ 5.3 6.5 5.6
Ovarian cancer characteristics
Ovarian cancer stage (%) <0.001
  Stage I 28.7 31.7 47.7
  Stage II 8.9 8.1 9.1
  Stage III 48.2 46.5 31.5
  Stage IV 14.2 13.7 11.7
Tumor differentiation (%) <0.001
  Well differentiated 8.7 8.0 9.5
  Moderately differentiated 19.5 17.5 17.0
  Poorly differentiated 35.8 38.0 28.3
  Undifferentiated 9.9 8.0 5.9
  Other differentiation 26.1 28.5 39.3
a

Comparison of continuous variable means between women undergoing ovarian cancer resection by a HVS and LVS.