Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Entomol. 2012 Nov;49(6):1430–1441. doi: 10.1603/me12103

Table 6.

Penetration and movement across the mosquito midgut by Chandlerella quiscali microfilariae (MF) when ingested by co-indigenous, wild-caught mosquitoes

Mosquito species Type of feeding MF ingested per mosquito (range) MF penetrating midgut (range) Prevalence of MF penetration (n)
Aedes vexans Membrane-high density 3211 (420–48,880) 6 (1–176) 42% (40)
Membrane-low density 24 (1–350) 2 (1–4) 9% (34)
Live bird 16 (6–68) 0 0% (14)
Aedes dorsalis Membrane-high density 1073 (396–5205) 65 (3–670) 67% (12)
Membrane-low density 52 (1–292) 5 (1–113) 43% (14)
Live bird 26 (3–88) 1 (1–2) 16% (25)
Aedes fiavescens Live bird 70 (22–136) 2 17% (6)
Aedes triseriatits Membrane-high density 1406 (607–4380) 4 (1–7) 50% (4)
Membrane-low density 142 (48–375) 1 17% (6)
Culex tarsalis Membrane-high density 2060 (500–12,125) 3 (1–9) 15% (52)
Membrane-low density 145 (1–432) 1 (1–3) 12% (33)
Live bird 21 (1–156) 1 12% (40)

Mosquitoes were either fed MF harvested from bird lungs, mixed with bird blood, and placed into prewarmed membrane feeders (=membrane) or were allowed to feed directly on anesthetized microfilaremic birds at night (=live bird).