Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 14;14:106. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0269-1

Table 4.

Age–sex adjusted analysis for prediction of CMD in T2DM patients

Independent CMD
OR (CI 95 %) p value
Dependent CMD
OR (CI 95 %) p value
Age (year) 1.06 (1.01–1.12) p 0.01* 0.98 (0.94–1.02) p 0.55
Female sex (%) 3.24 (1.24–9.14) p 0.01* 1.36 (0.90–1.02) p 0.23
BMI (kg/m2) 1.06 (0.99–1.48) p 0.07 0.96 (0.52–1.24) p 0.25
GFR MDRD (ml/min) 1.00 (0.98–1.02) p 0.49 0.97 (0.95–0.99) p 0.04*
Risk factors
 Hypertension (%) 1.16 (0.43–3.27) p 0.75 1.27 (0.52–3.26) p 0.59
 Triglycerides (mg/dl) 1.00 (0.99–1.00) p 0.87 0.99 (0.99–1.00) p 0.61
Diabetes control
 HBA1c (%) 1.21 (0.94–1.59) p 0.13 0.88 (0.67–1.12) p 0.32
 HBA1c < 7% 0.60 (0.23–1.46) p 0.26 0.99 (0.43–2.24) p 0.98
 Fasting glucose (mg/dl) 1.00 (0.99–1.01) p 0.67 0.99 (0.98–1.00) p 0.20
Medication
 Nitrates 1.50 (0.61–3.76) p 0.36 0.59 (0.26–1.36) p 0.22
 Lipid lowering 1.21 (0.48–3.07) p 0.68 1.22 (0.53–2.80) p 0.63

CMD coronary microvascular dysfunction, BMI body mass index, GFR glomerular filtrate rate, CFR coronary flow reserve, CRF < 2.5 independent CMD, CBFAch<50 % endothelial dependent CMD.

* Statistically significant.