Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 13;10(8):e0134942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134942

Table 4. Subset analysis according to tumor location.

MC EUS ≥pT1-SMD P
Rectum Tis/ T1-SMS Tis/ T1-SMS 3/14 (21.4%)
Tis/ T1-SMS ≥T1-SMD 1/2 (50.0%)
≥T1-SMD Tis/ T1-SMS 2/4 (50.0%)
≥T1-SMD ≥T1-SMD 8/13 (61.5%)
Accuracy 22/33 (66.7%) 22/33 (66.7%) 1.000 #1
Sensitivity 10/14 (71.4%) 9/14 (64.3%) 1.000 #2
Specificity 12/19 (63.2%) 13/19 (68.4%) 0.732 #1
Non-rectum Tis/ T1-SMS Tis/ T1-SMS 3/13 (23.1%)
Tis/ T1-SMS ≥T1-SMD 1/3 (33.3%)
≥T1-SMD Tis/ T1-SMS 2/5 (40.0%)
≥T1-SMD ≥T1-SMD 11/12 (91.7%)
Accuracy 25/33 (75.8%) 25/33 (75.8%) 1.000 #1
Sensitivity 13/17 (76.5%) 12/17 (70.6%) 1.000 #2
Specificity 12/16 (75.0%) 13/16 (81.3%) 1.000 #2

#1 χ2 test

#2 Fisher’s exact probability test. Tis/T1-SMS, mucosal to submucosal cancer with invasion depth <1000 μm; T1-SMD, submucosal cancer with submucosal invasion depth ≥1000 μm.