Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Jul 9;154:199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.06.045

Table 2.

Bivariate associations between individual-level frequency of substance use and individual-level CAS.

Heavy Drinking
χ2 (2)
No Use (n = 158)
Lower Frequency (n = 94)
Higher Frequency (n = 119)
n % n % n %
Any CAS in TLFB 106 67.1 68 72.3 78 65.5 1.20, p = 0.55
Any CAS in Diary 90 57.0 57 60.6 65 54.6 0.78, p = 0.68
Mdn IQR Mdn IQR Mdn IQR H(2)

# CAS Acts in TLFB 3.0 0, 8 1.0 0, 5 1.0 0, 5 4.92, p = 0.09
Marijuana
χ2 (2)
No Use (n = 185)
Lower Frequency (n = 91)
Higher Frequency (n = 95)
n % n % n %
Any CAS in TLFB 118 63.8 69 75.8 65 68.4 4.07, p = 0.13
Any CAS in Diary 106 57.3 58 63.7 48 50.5 3.32, p = 0.19
Mdn IQR Mdn IQR Mdn IQR H(2)

# CAS Acts in TLFB 1.0 0, 5 3.0 0, 7 2.0 0, 5 4.17, p = 0.12
Club drugs
χ2 (2)
No Use (n = 235)
Lower Frequency (n = 66)
Higher Frequency (n = 70)
n % n % n %
Any CAS in TLFB 150 63.8 47 71.2 55 78.6 5.78, p = 0.06
Any CAS in Diary 136 57.9 32 48.5 44 62.9 3.01, p = 0.22
Mdn IQR Mdn IQR Mdn IQR H(2)

# CAS Acts in TLFB 1.0 0, 5 2.0 0, 5 4.0 1, 11 11.51, p = 0.003

Note: Number of CAS acts was compared using a Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test (medians presented for interpretability). Number of acts from the diary was not computed due to inability to account for missing diary data when aggregating.