Table 2.
Comparison of nanotechnology applications on different factors: means (standard errors) based on repeated measure ANOVA
| Factorsa | Smart pesticide | Nano-encapsulated food | Food packaging | Importance of factor for introduction of nanotechnology (1 = extremely important, 5 = not at all important)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concerns about technological implementation (1 = extremely likely to raise concern, 5 = not at all likely to raise concern)1 | 2.80 (.05) a | 2.78 (.05) a | 2.95 (.05) b | 2.26 (.05) I |
| Benefits and need (1 = extremely beneficial and necessary, 5 = not at all beneficial and necessary)1 | 3.16 (.06) a | 3.01 (.06) b | 2.97 (.06) b | 2.60 (.05) II |
| Access to technology (1 = extremely likely to have access, 5 = not at all likely to have access)1 | 3.30 (.06) a | 3.37 (.07) a | 2.98 (.07) b | 2.81 (.06) III |
| Risk and fear (1 = extremely risky and frightening, 5 = not at all risky and frightening)1 | 3.57 (.05) a | 3.71 (.05) b | 3.79 (.06) b | 2.27 (.05) I |
N = 417
aMeans with different letters are significantly different between applications or factors (pairwise comparisons LSD; α = 0.05)
bMeans with a different superscript Roman numeral are significantly different between applications or factors (pairwise comparisons LSD; α = 0.05)