Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2015 Sep;42(9):498–504. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000325

Table 3. Adjusteda Prevalence Ratios (PR) for Participants' and Partners' Concurrency, among African American women from four rural counties in the Southeastern US, 2008-2009.

Participants' Concurrency d Partners' Concurrency e
PR 95% CI PR 95% CI
Marital status
 Single 1. 1.
 Married/living together 0.56 0.40, 0.83 0.84 0.55, 1.27
Education level
 Less than high school 1.15 0.87, 1.52 1.30 0.94, 1.78
Income, food security
 Household income ≤12k/year 0.99 0.80, 1.24 0.97 0.75, 1.26
 Worried about enough food for you or your family? 0.98 0.75, 1.29 1.12 0.81, 1.55
Alcohol and drug use
 Use of illicit drugs b in past 12 months 1.17 0.85, 1.60 1.23 0.74, 2.05
 Binge alcohol consumption c 1.22 0.99, 1.50 1.17 0.86, 1.59
History of violence
 Age at first sex (per 5 year inc) 0.82 0.62, 1.07 0.94 0.72, 1.23
 Intimate partner violence, ever 1.61 1.23, 2.11 1.65 1.20, 2.26
 Forced sexual contact, ever 1.05 0.79, 1.39 1.62 1.18, 2.24
a

All models were adjusted for age and all other covariates, except: no models were adjusted for drug use; the model for marital status was not adjusted for income or food insecurity; the model for education was not adjusted for income or food insecurity; the model for income was not adjusted for food insecurity.

b

Excluding marijuana

c

>4 drinks in one day during the last 30 days

d

Participant's concurrency defined as an overlap of >1 month in dates of three most recent sexual partnerships

e

Partner's concurrency defined as participant's report of partner in the past 12 months “definitely” having had concurrent partner(s) during their sexual partnership