Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Aug 10;72(3):356–366. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09r05192gre

Table 3.

Summary of Quality of Evidence for Pharmacotherapy for Bipolar II Depression and Implications for Clinical Practice

Medication Rating of Quality of Evidence Implications for Treatment of Bipolar II Depression
Quetiapine Type A: Pooled data from 2 large studies support its efficacy Consider as a first line option
Lamotrigine Type A: Very small effect size when used as monotherapy in 5 individual RCTs; modest advantage over placebo when examined in “meta-regression;” suggestion of advantage over placebo when used as augmentation strategy Consider as a second line option both monotherapy and as an augmentation strategy
Lithium Type B: Single positive open-label trial and historical clinical experience Consider as a second line option
Antidepressants/Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) Type B: Preliminary results of open-label studies of antidepressants as monotherapy are promising; controlled trials of antidepressants as augmentation strategy show no advantage over placebo Consider SSRI monotherapy as a second line option; antidepressants as a group may have limited utility as an augmentation strategy, although further testing of individual agents is indicated
Pramipexole Type B: One small RCT suggest utility as augmentation strategy Consider pramipexole as a second line augmentation strategy
Valproate Not established Inadequate data
Modafinil Adjunctive treatment was associated with improvement in a mixed BP I/II cohort, but no clear signal for BP II subjects emerged Inadequate data
Omega-3 Fatty Acids A small number of individuals with BP II were included in two large RCTs but were not examined separately. Inadequate data; available information is conflicting about its benefit as an add-on treatment in mixed BP I/II samples.