Table 5. Foraging guild phenotypes at the end of 140 agent exemplar runs.

Clonal reproduction		Parameter phenotype values
Type	Number	α × 103	δ × 103	ρ × 103	Biomass
1	52	67 ± 3	23 ± 2	192 ± 5	6.3 ± 2.2
2	12	209 ± 2	37 ± 1	206 ± 2	6.8 ± 1.2
3	18	240 ± 1	9 ± 5	204 ± 3	7.0 ± 2.0
4	22	758 ± 2	7 ± 2	156 ± 5	7.3 ± 2.5
5	4	808 ± 1	42 ± 1	180 ± 3	7.1 ± 1.6
6	20	1191 ± 2	26 ± 3	157 ± 2	6.8 ± 2.7
7	12	1520 ± 01	−31 ± 1	124 ± 2	5.8 ± 3.7
Total	140				6.6 ± 2.4
Random mating		Parameter phenotype values
Type	Obs (Exp ‡ )	α × 103	δ × 103	ρ × 103	Biomass
Genotypes †
α 1 α 1 δδρρ	22 (20.8)	45 ± 5	9 ± 13	188 ± 9	7.3 ± 1.8
α 1 α 2 δδρρ	38 (37.0)	345 ± 5	18 ± 14	189 ± 9	7.1 ± 1.5
α 2 α 2 δδρρ	18 (16.5)	645 ± 4	18 ± 9	188 ± 8	7.2 ± 2.1
α 2 α 3 δδρρ	22 (26.1)	864 ± 3	19 ± 11	187 ± 7	5.9 ± 2.4
α 3 α 3 δδρρ	14 (10.3)	1031 ± 4	18 ± 15	188 ± 7	7.05 ± 2.5
α 1 α 3 δδρρ	26 (29.3)	562 ± 5	19 ± 8	1928 ± 8	6.8 ± 2.4
Total	140				6.9 ± 2.1

^† Although more than one allele is evident for δ and ρ that variation is low (cf. left panel in Fig 9): so we only sort on α

^‡ Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium theory: differences between observed and expected not significant