Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Feb 12;138(1):281–289. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2397-6

Table 4.

Studies comparing survival outcomes between races for women with TNBC

Study Study population Period diagnosed Median age in years (range)a Patient (n)a TNBC or Basal-like (n) Median F/u in years (range)a Outcome
Lund et al. [21] 3 counties in metropolitan Atlanta, GA (multi-center population-based, case control study) May 1990–Dec 1992 20–54 476 135
AA: 56
CA: 79
11.4 HR for OS 2.0 (95 % CI 1.0–3.7) for AA (adjusted for age, stage, grade, poverty index, treatment and treatment delay)
O'Brien et al. [29] 24 counties of eastern and central North Carolina (multi-center, population-based, case control study), enriched for AA and age < 50 years 1993–2001 20–74 1,149 197
AA: 117
CA: 80
9 (0.2–13.7) HR for breast cancer specific survival 1.3 (95 % CI 0.8–2.3) for AA (adjusted for age, date and stage of diagnosis)
Sparano et al. [30] Participants in a randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial E1199 Oct 1999–Jan 2002b 51 (19–84) 4, 817 886
AA:129
Non-AA: 757
7.9 (0–9.9)c HR for breast cancer specific survival 0.81 (95 % CI 0.51–1.28, p = 0.37) for AA
Bauer et al. [22] A population-based registry covering the state of California Jan 1999–Dec 2003 TNBC median 54, other breast cancer types median 60 51,074 6,370
AA: 636
CA: 3959
N/A 5 yr survival: AA 14 % stage III/IV, CA 36 % stage III/IV, Hispanic 37 % stage III/IV
Dawood et al. [28] Prospective cohort study of database patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center 1996–2005 AA: 47 (22–75) Other: 48 (25–78) 471 471
AA: 100
Other: 371
2 (0.02–9.75) HR for DFS 1.08 (95 % CI 0.69–1.68) for CA. HR for OS 1.08 (95 % CI 0.69–1.68, p = 0.735) for CA
Sachdev [24] Retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to the University of Tennessee Cancer Institute Sep 2003–Dec 2008 51 (26–82) 124 124
AA: 88
CA: 36
1.91 (0.08–10.3) HR for DFS 0.62, p = 0.29 for CA, HR for breast cancer specific survival 0.36, p = 0.18 for CA
Pacheco et al. (current study) Retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to the Washington University Saint Louis Breast Oncology Clinic Jan 1st 2006–Dec 16th 2010 53 (23–98) 490 490
AA: 146
CA: 344
2.26 (0.01–16.2) HR for DFS 0.91 (CI 0.62–1.35) p = 0.64 for AA, HR for OS 1.19 (CI 0.80–1.78) p = 0.39 for AA (adjusted for age and stage)
a

Values represent those for all breast cancer subtypes combined

b

Enrolled during this time period for adjuvant therapy, not diagnosed during this time period

c

Median follow-up for surviving patients