Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J AAPOS. 2015 Apr;19(2):157–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.01.011

Table 2.

Breakdown of the causes of gold standard eye examination failure (N = 65)a

Classification Description Number (%)
Reduced VA due to uncorrected refractive error VA improved to normal for age with refractive correction in place; no strabismus or media opacity N = 31 (48)
Media opacity VA remained subnormal for age with refractive correction in place and refractive error (applying published criteria15) or strabismus not present, but media opacity diagnosed N = 0 (0)
Unilateral amblyopia VA remained subnormal for age with refractive correction in place, with interocular VA difference of ≥3 lines4 and refractive error and/or manifest strabismus present. N = 7 (11)
Amblyogenic refractive error defined according to previously published criteria15:
    • ≥1.00 D SE anisohyperopia
    • ≥3.00 D SE anisomyopia
    • ≥1.50 D anisoastigmatism
Bilateral amblyopia VA remained subnormal for age in both eyes with refractive correction in place and refractive error in both eyes was either: N = 8 (12)
    • ≥ +4.00 D SE
    • ≥ +2.00 D cylinder
    • ≥ −6.00 D SE16
Refractive error alone (normal VA) Refractive error failed by gold standard thresholds (Table 1), but uncorrected VA was normal for age. N = 8 (12)
Unexplained reduced VA VA remained subnormal for age with refractive correction in place and refractive error (applying published criteria15); manifest strabismus or media opacity not present N = 10 (15)
Ocular misalignment Manifest strabismus >8 PD in primary position N = 1 (2)

D, diopters; PD, prism diopters; SE, spherical equivalent; VA, visual acuity.

a

Where there was more than one reason for failing the gold standard eye examination, cause of failure was classified hierarchically as follows: (1) uncorrected refractive error; (2) media opacity; (3) unilateral amblyopia; (4) bilateral amblyopia; (5) refractive error alone; (6) Unexplained reduced visual acuity. Patients were classified in the manifest strabismus category if a tropia >8 PD was present, but VA was normal and refractive error did not meet gold standard failure criteria.