Table 1. Means (±SD) of amplitude accuracy estimates (across all 67 sites) by generator model for each transformation and ANOVA F ratios.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simulated sourcea | Shallow | Deep | Shallow | Shallow | |||||
CSD4 | 0.88 | ±0.14 | 0.90 | ±0.11 | 0.89 | ±0.09 | 0.71 | ±0.19 | |
NR | 0.82 | ±0.17 | 0.80 | ±0.16 | 0.82 | ±0.17 | 0.78 | ±0.15 | |
AR | 0.81 | ±0.11 | 0.80 | ±0.10 | 0.77 | ±0.11 | 0.62 | ±0.20 | |
Effect b | F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | |
| |||||||||
Transformation c | 18.0 | <.0001 | 44.2 | <.0001 | 20.3 | <.0001 | 14.1 | <.0001 | |
Contrasts | NR-CSD | 34.4 | <.0001 | 67.9 | <.0001 | 24.3 | <.0001 | 7.38 | .008 |
AR-CSD | 34.7 | <.0001 | 153.4 | <.0001 | 46.0 | <.0001 | 8.07 | .006 | |
AR-NR | 3.89 | .053 | 23.9 | <.0001 |
CSD4: current source density, m = 4; NR: nose reference; AR: average reference.
For all effects, df = 1, 66. Only F ratios with p < .10 are reported.
Greenhouse-Geisser adjusted df, 0.69097 ≤ ε ≤ 0.89650.