Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 28;23(9):1142–1150. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.279

Table 2. Diagnosis for 9 CARDIO patientsa.

Patient CGC 1 CGC 2 CGC 3 CGC 4 CGC 5 CGC 6 CGC 7 CGC 8
1 TNNI3 TNNI3 TNNI3 TNNI3 TNNI3 TNNI3 TNNI3 TNNI3
2 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3
3 MYH7 MYH7 MYH7 MYH7 MYH7 MYH7 MYH7 MYH7
4 MYH7
5 LMNA LMNA LMNA LMNA LMNA LMNA LMNA NA
6 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3
7 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3
8 PLN PLN PLN PLN PLN PLN PLN PLN
9 GLA MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3 MYBPC3
a

Each center independently provided a diagnosis for each patient based on the most likely gene mutation. The table cells indicate in which gene the particular center identified the causal variant for the corresponding patient. Discordant diagnoses are indicated in bold. Only one center reported a causal mutation for patient 4. NA, not assessed; ‘−‘, no causal variant reported.