Clift 1978.
| Methods | Parallel RCT (conducted from February 1974 to September 1977). Single centre. Country: USA. | |
| Participants |
Inclusion criteria: Adults and children with acute leukaemia and aplastic anaemia undergoing related HLA‐matched allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation Exclusion criteria: Infection criteria for excluding people from the study was not reported Total randomised N = 86 Total analysed N = 69 Arm 1 (Granulocyte transfusions):randomised = 41, analysed = 29 ; Acute leukaemia = 17, Aplastic anaemia = 12 Arm 2 (Control): randomised = 45, analysed = 40: Acute leukaemia = 27 , Aplastic anaemia = 13 |
|
| Interventions | Comparison between standard treatment and prophylactic granulocyte transfusions Granulocyte dose: mean 2.22 x 1010 (leucofiltration) 1.57 x 1010 (centrifugation) Granulocyte method of collection: by either continuous flow centrifugation or reversible leukoadhesion to nylon columns Donor premedication: None Initiation of granulocyte transfusions: 1st post‐transplant day neutrophil count ≤ 0.2 x 109/L Frequency of granulocyte transfusions: Daily Termination of granulocyte transfusions: Neutrophil count > 0.2 x 109/L [not clearly stated] |
|
| Outcomes |
Primary Outcome: The effectiveness of granulocytes in reducing the acquisition of bacterial or fungal infection during the first 21 post‐transplant days Secondary Outcomes: Mortality/survival, fever (days or episodes), infection (days or episodes), antibiotic use, adverse events |
|
| Definition of infection |
Febrile day ‐ two temperatures greater than 38.3oC in 24 hours. Febrile episode ‐ not defined Proven infection: subdivided in to:‐ Septicaemia ‐ at least one positive blood culture with appropriate symptoms, or two consecutive blood cultures growing the same organism (daily surveillance blood cultures were performed). Local infection ‐ lesions with symptoms or signs of infection and isolation of causative bacterial or fungal organisms. |
|
| Definition of neutropenia | Not reported but the 'trigger' neutrophil count was 0.2 x 109/L | |
| Co‐interventions |
Prophylactic antibiotics: not reported Therapeutic antibiotics: no restrictions on type of systemic antibiotic treatment given. Therapeutic granulocyte transfusions: participants in the control group were eligible for granulocyte transfusions as clinically indicated for the treatment of established infection. |
|
| Notes |
Funding Sources: Grants CA18579, CA18029, CA17117 and CA15704 from the National Cancer Institute. Dr Thomas is the recipient of a research career award (AI 02425) from the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases Conflict of Interests: Not reported |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of sequence generation was not reported |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of allocation concealment was not reported |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | It was not reported whether participants were blinded to the intervention. It was not reported whether clinicians or investigators were blinded to the intervention. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | It was not reported whether outcome assessors were blinded to the intervention |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Only 40 of the 45 participants randomised to the control group were included in the analysis. Only 29 of the 41 participants randomised to the intervention group were included in the analysis. Five randomised participants were not included in the control group:
Twelve randomised participants were not included in the intervention group:
|
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | The protocol was not available to assess whether any pre‐specified outcomes were not reported or outcomes were reported that were not pre‐specified |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Although none identified, it is difficult to rule out any significant bias due to insufficient reporting of the study. More control participants had relapsed disease (16/40 compared to 8/29). |