Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 17;9:214. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00214

Table 1.

Impact of DD over UG strategies and expected payoffs.

Dependent vars. Offer MAO Offer-MAO Own payoff Other’s payoff
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Short-run DD -0.0294 0.0428 -0.0722∗∗ -0.0115 -0.0252
(0.157) (0.052) (0.024) (0.131) (0.053)
Long-run DD -0.0324∗∗ 0.0393 -0.0717∗∗∗ 0.0018 -0.0269∗∗∗
(0.041) (0.051) (0.004) (0.785) (0.009)
Combined DD -0.0437∗∗ 0.0581∗∗ -0.1018∗∗∗ -0.0070 -0.0369∗∗∗
(0.038) (0.017) (0.002) (0.404) (0.006)
Highdd vs. lowDD -0.0281 0.0431∗∗∗ -0.0711∗∗∗ -0.0069 -0.0231∗∗
(0.052) (0.005) (0.001) (0.215) (0.013)

The estimated coefficients for different DD characterizations as explanatory variables are shown in rows. Dependent variables are expressed as a fraction of the pie (€20). Each estimate refers to a different OLS regression with robust standard errors clustered by interviewer (108 groups) and controlling for age, gender, married, household income, educational level, mathematical cognitive abilities, risk preferences, and order effects. N = 713, except for the last row where n = 488. oxP-values are shown in brackets (two-tailed). P < 0.10, ∗∗P < 0.05, ∗∗∗P < 0.01. The complete regressions are presented in Supplementary Tables S1S4.