Table 2. Comparison of strength of Spearman correlations between HRBS and AUC by partner condition.
Partner Condition | Scenario (Spearman correlation) | Scenario (Spearman correlation) | Two-sided p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Least Attractive | Negative No Regret (-0.2616) | Negative Regret (0.0093) | 0.0308* |
Negative No Regret (-0.2616) | Positive (-0.2102) | 0.6829 | |
Positive (-0.2102) | Negative Regret (0.0093) | 0.0782 | |
Most Attractive | Negative No Regret (-0.1629) | Negative Regret (0.0787) | 0.0567 |
Negative No Regret (-0.1629) | Positive (-0.2756) | 0.3767 | |
Positive (-0.2756) | Negative Regret (0.0787) | 0.0048** | |
Least STI | Negative No Regret (-0.1659) | Negative Regret (0.1071) | 0.0279* |
Negative No Regret (-0.1659) | Positive (-0.3329) | 0.1825 | |
Positive (-0.3329) | Negative Regret (0.1071) | 0.0004** | |
Most STI | Negative No Regret (-0.2838) | Negative Regret (-.0899) | 0.1169 |
Negative No Regret (-0.2838) | Positive (-0.1257) | 0.2019 | |
Positive (-0.1257) | Negative Regret (-.0899) | 0.7685 |