Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 17;10(8):e0135977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135977

Table 2. Comparison of strength of Spearman correlations between HRBS and AUC by partner condition.

One star denotes significance at the 0.05 level and two stars denotes significance at the 0.01 level.

Partner Condition Scenario (Spearman correlation) Scenario (Spearman correlation) Two-sided p-value
Least Attractive Negative No Regret (-0.2616) Negative Regret (0.0093) 0.0308*
Negative No Regret (-0.2616) Positive (-0.2102) 0.6829
Positive (-0.2102) Negative Regret (0.0093) 0.0782
Most Attractive Negative No Regret (-0.1629) Negative Regret (0.0787) 0.0567
Negative No Regret (-0.1629) Positive (-0.2756) 0.3767
Positive (-0.2756) Negative Regret (0.0787) 0.0048**
Least STI Negative No Regret (-0.1659) Negative Regret (0.1071) 0.0279*
Negative No Regret (-0.1659) Positive (-0.3329) 0.1825
Positive (-0.3329) Negative Regret (0.1071) 0.0004**
Most STI Negative No Regret (-0.2838) Negative Regret (-.0899) 0.1169
Negative No Regret (-0.2838) Positive (-0.1257) 0.2019
Positive (-0.1257) Negative Regret (-.0899) 0.7685