Table 3. Results of APIM Analyses Examining the Effect of Speech Reticence on Observed Social Behavior.
| CAUG-NIG Dyads | FCG-NIG Dyads | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| b | SE | t | b | SE | t | |
| Social Competence | ||||||
| Actor Main Effect | -.50 | .12 | -3.98** | .04 | .12 | .34 |
| Actor Interaction Effect | .09 | .13 | 0.72 | -.29 | .13 | -2.15* |
| Partner Main Effect | -.14 | .12 | -1.14 | -.01 | .13 | -.07 |
| Partner Interaction Effect | -.03 | .12 | -0.27 | .17 | .14 | 1.23 |
| Social Engagement (Competitive tasks) | ||||||
| Actor Main Effect | -.15 | .08 | -1.96t | -.05 | .11 | -.44 |
| Actor Interaction Effect | -.05 | .08 | -.57 | -.05 | .12 | -.43 |
| Partner Main Effect | -.00 | .09 | -.04 | -.06 | .12 | -.47 |
| Partner Interaction Effect | .18 | .09 | 2.03* | .01 | .14 | .08 |
| Social Engagement (Cooperative tasks) | ||||||
| Actor Main Effect | -.28 | .08 | -3.33** | -.15 | .13 | -1.2 |
| Actor Interaction Effect | -.07 | .09 | -.84 | -.29 | .15 | -1.92 |
| Partner Main Effect | -.18 | .09 | -1.99t | -.09 | .13 | -.69 |
| Partner Interaction Effect | .11 | .10 | 1.19 | .10 | .15 | .70 |
| Social Withdrawal (Competitive tasks) | ||||||
| Actor Main Effect | -.06 | .10 | -.60 | -.13 | .12 | -1.11 |
| Actor Interaction Effect | .03 | .10 | .33 | .14 | .13 | 1.08 |
| Partner Main Effect | -.15 | .13 | -1.15 | .03 | .11 | .30 |
| Partner Interaction Effect | -.17 | .13 | -1.27 | -.18 | .12 | -1.41 |
| Task Orientation (Cooperative tasks) | ||||||
| Actor Main Effect | .08 | .08 | 1.09 | .02 | .11 | .17 |
| Actor Interaction Effect | -.07 | .08 | -.88 | .02 | .12 | .15 |
| Partner Main Effect | .19 | .09 | 2.16* | .06 | .12 | .49 |
| Partner Interaction Effect | .09 | .09 | 1.04 | -.06 | .13 | -.44 |
Note:
**
p<.01;
*
p<.05;
t
p≤.06