Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Jan;44(1):167–178. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-9982-1

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for the control vs. ADHD group for demographics

N Control ADHD p-value
213 251
% Male 42.3 % 66.9 % <0.001
Age (SD) 11.0 (2.4) 10.5 (2.3) 0.02
% Stimulant medication 1.4 % 37.1 % <0.001
% Caucasian 76.5 % 72.1 % 0.64
Income (SD)+ 79.0 (47.4) 64.5 (38.7) 0.002
KSADS-E diagnostic interview
 Parent inattention Sx (SD) 0.74 (1.4) 7.2 (1.9) <0.001
 Parent hyperactivity-impulsivity Sx (SD) 0.62 (1.2) 4.3 (2.9) <0.001
 % Oppositional defiant disorder (lifetime) 14.1 % 41.6 % <0.001
 % Conduct disorder (lifetime) 0.5 % 8.4 % <0.001
Child temperament traits – parent report
 Reactive control (SD) 5.0 (1.0) 4.2 (1.1) <0.001
 Resiliency (SD) 6.0 (0.86) 5.2 (0.99) <0.001
 Negative emotionality (SD) 3.8 (1.2) 4.6 (1.3) <0.001
 Conscientiousness (SD) 6.1 (1.3) 3.9 (1.3) <0.001
 Agreeableness (SD) 6.6 (1.1) 5.9 (1.3) <0.001
Parenting dimensions – youth report
 Maternal involvement (SD) 35.4 (5.8) 33.4 (7.1) 0.001
 Paternal involvement (SD) 29.7 (10.3) 26.4 (11.4) 0.001
 Poor supervision/monitoring (SD) 18.6 (5.3) 20.6 (6.4) <0.001
 Inconsistent discipline (SD) 12.8 (3.7) 14.1 (4.0) <0.001

SD standard deviation, HI hyperactivity-impulsivity. Higher scores for temperament and parenting measures indicated that trait was more descriptive of the child and increased levels of the specific parenting behavior. + Income reported in thousands