Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 15;30(9):1349–1358. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3372-9

Table 2.

Characteristics of 72 Studies Included in a Systematic Review on Primary Care Specialty Choice

Characteristic N (% of 72)
Location
 United States 41 (57)
 Europe 11 (15)
 Australia and New Zealand 11 (15)
 Canada 4 (6)
 Asia 5 (7)
Single-/multi-institution
 Single medical school 61 (85)
 More than one medical school 11 (15)
Type of intervention
 Compulsory clerkships 28 (39)
 Longitudinal programs or special curricula 26 (36)
 Electives 10 (14)
 Interest groups 3 (4)
 Student-run free clinic 3 (4)
 Other* 2 (3)
Objective of intervention
 Promotion of primary care 35 (48)
 Promotion of rural practice 18 (25)
 Promotion of primary care in a rural context 7 (10)
 Promotion of care for underserved populations 4 (6)
 Aim of intervention not specified 8 (11)
Timing of the evaluation†
 Follow-up only 29 (40)
 Pre and post 12 (16)
 Pre, post and follow-up 10 (14)
 Long-term repeated follow-up 7 (10)
 Post and follow-up 5 (7)
 Post 4 (6)
 During 3 (4)
 Pre and follow-up 2 (3)
Comparison
 Studies using a control group 30 (42)
 Random allocation of students to intervention 4 (6)
Data collection method
 Survey, unvalidated (or validation not specified) 39 (54)
 National Residency Matching Database 19 (26)
 Other databases 10 (14)
 Survey, validated (including state-wide questionnaires) 8 (11)
 Physicians’ Associations’ databases 7 (10)
 Focus groups 5 (7)
 Semi-structured interviews 4 (6)
 Essays 1 (1)
 Studies using more than one data collection method 15 (21)
Methods of quantitative data analysis N (% of 65)
 Inferential statistics, unadjusted 31 (48)
 Descriptive statistics only 21 (32)
 Inferential statistics, adjusted for more than 3 independent variables 7 (11)
 Inferential statistics, adjusted for 1 to 3 independent variables 6 (9 )

*Includes an integrated residency program and an intercalated research degree.

†Indicates when data were collected: follow-up (at a point beyond the immediate completion of the intervention); pre (before or at the beginning of the intervention); post (immediately following the end of the intervention); long-term repeated follow-up (longitudinal database follow-up of students and/or graduates over several years); during (during the course of the intervention)