Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun;48(6):564–570. doi: 10.1177/0004867413516681

Table 2.

CTQ scores in bipolar groups compared to controls.a

All bipolar
N = 60b
Bipolar I
N = 31b,c
Bipolar II
N = 25b,c
Control
N = 55%
Comparison
Comparison
Comparison
CTQ (SD) U p CTQ (SD) U p CTQ (SD) U p CTQ (SD)
CTQ total 44.4 (19.1) 490.0 < 0.001 43.6 (20.6) 280.5 0.004 41.1 (13.1) 203.0 0.003 31.2 (8.0)
Emotional abuse 10.4 (5.4) 780.0 < 0.001 10.2 (5.8) 470.0 0.012 9.7 (4.3) 294.0 0.005 6.8 (2.8)
Physical abuse 7.5 (4.4) 903.0 0.005 7.9 (4.9) 461.0 0.005 6.0 (2.1) 439.5 0.387 5.4 (1.3)
Sexual abuse 7.7 (5.4) 1092.5 0.131 7.9 (4.9) 584.5 0.182 7.1 (4.1) 428.5 0.224 6.2 (3.1)
Emotional neglect 12.4 (6.0) 767.0 < 0.001 12.7 (7.0) 459.5 0.011 11.1 (4.2) 299.0 0.008 8.2 (3.5)
Physical neglect 7.9 (3.8) 787.5 < 0.001 8.1 (4.2) 446.0 0.002 7.2 (3.0) 306.5 0.003 5.7 (1.7)
a

Table showing mean and SD of CTQ scores in different subject groups with a comparison using Mann–Whitney U-test of CTQ scores between the bipolar groups (all bipolar patients and those with a diagnosis of bipolar I or bipolar II) with controls.

b

Numbers vary due to the incomplete return of CTQs: all bipolar, N = 49–57; bipolar I, N = 25–31; bipolar II, N = 20–22; control, N = 39–45.

c

Four participants with bipolar disorder were not sub-classified as either bipolar I or II.

CTQ: Childhood Trauma Questionnaire.