Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep;105(9):1806–1813. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302655

TABLE 4—

State-Specific Logit Models Assessing Ordinal Dependent Variable for Number of Venue Types (Worksites, Restaurants, Bars) Covered by a 100% Smoke-Free Law as of July 2011: US Tobacco Control Laws Database and 2006–2010 American Community Survey

Sociodemographic Characteristics Alabama (n = 1130), OR (95% CI) Alaska (n = 330), OR (95% CI) Indiana (n = 1851), OR (95% CI) Kentucky (n = 1061), OR (95% CI) Mississippi (n = 1081), OR (95% CI) Missouri (n = 2616), OR (95% CI) North Dakota (n = 1587), OR (95% CI) South Carolina (n = 753), OR (95% CI) Texas (n = 2797), OR (95% CI) West Virginia (n = 704), OR (95% CI)
Logit modela
 Urban status 8.861** (2.783, 28.220) 2.587 (0.674, 9.922) 1.485* (1.040, 2.121) 5.170** (2.939, 9.097) 5.178** (2.245, 11.940) . . .b 1.162 (0.148, 9.110) 2.199** (1.213, 3.989) 28.540** (3.791, 214.800) 0.656** (0.485, 0.887)
 Total population (log) 1.096 (0.920, 1.305) 1.256 (0.880, 1.794) 1.230** (1.086, 1.393) 0.838* (0.723, 0.972) 1.402** (1.117, 1.761) 1.618** (1.415, 1.850) 3.343** (1.470, 7.599) 1.209* (1.042, 1.403) 1.322** (1.165, 1.501) 1.085 (0.976, 1.207)
 % racial/ethnic minority 1.053 (0.779, 1.424) 0.750 (0.363, 1.551) 1.064 (0.901, 1.258) 1.548** (1.281, 1.871) 0.933 (0.726, 1.199) 3.558** (2.681, 4.720) 1.041 (0.088, 12.36) 1.088 (0.860, 1.376) 1.718** (1.331, 2.219) 1.028 (0.902, 1.171)
 % living and working in same locality 3.570** (2.511, 5.076) 1.724 (0.977, 3.044) 1.450** (1.268, 1.658) 1.406** (1.196, 1.652) 2.647** (1.995, 3.514) 1.266** (1.103, 1.453) 2.222 (0.511, 9.669) 1.196* (1.004, 1.426) 3.695** (2.863, 4.768) 1.061 (0.943, 1.195)
 % with < high-school diploma 0.705 (0.459, 1.083) 0.784 (0.358, 1.717) 0.854 (0.719, 1.015) 0.672** (0.517, 0.874) 0.901 (0.709, 1.146) 0.653** (0.538, 0.793) 0.995 (0.179, 5.533) 0.508** (0.381, 0.678) 0.593** (0.444, 0.792) 0.890 (0.777, 1.020)
 Per capita income in past 12 mo 1.155 (0.289, 4.616) 3.789 (0.934, 15.370) 2.050** (1.396, 3.009) 4.382** (2.097, 9.156) 1.314 (0.629, 2.749) 3.123** (1.672, 5.836) 2.068 (0.017, 255.4) 1.374 (0.677, 2.790) 2.369** (1.237, 4.537) 0.572* (0.336, 0.973)
 % working in blue-collar occupations 1.287 (0.819, 2.025) 1.173 (0.698, 1.973) 0.717** (0.601, 0.855) 0.722** (0.569, 0.918) 0.895 (0.707, 1.132) 0.766* (0.622, 0.942) 2.066 (0.577, 7.393) 1.040 (0.787, 1.375) 0.797 (0.607, 1.045) 0.801** (0.693, 0.925)
Logit model with interaction (racial/ethnic minority and urban status) 0.642 (0.371, 1.111) 5.684* (1.286, 25.120) 1.369* (1.002, 1.872) 2.643** (1.663, 4.202) 0.898 (0.497, 1.623) . . .b . . .b 1.166 (0.723, 1.881) 2.356** (1.819, 3.050) 1.175 (0.903, 1.528)

Note. CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.

a

The reported results are ORs from the Logit model. An OR of > 1 implies that an explanatory variable is associated with higher odds of the outcome. An OR of < 1 implies that an explanatory variable is associated with lower odds of the outcome. An OR  = 1 implies that an explanatory variable does not affect the odds of the outcome. For example, the OR for the variable “urban status” in Alabama is 8.861; this implies that, everything else being constant, the odds that an urban locality in Alabama has a comprehensive smoke-free law in a greater number of venue types are 8.861 times higher than that for a nonurban locality in Alabama.

b

Urban status was dropped from the model for Missouri because of the complete determination in maximum likelihood estimation. The indicator for the interaction between percentage racial/ethnic minority and urban status was dropped from the model for Missouri and North Dakota for the same reason.

*P < .05; **P < .01.