Table 3.
Direct Effects Model | Models with Mediation by | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I. Parent use | II. Monitoring | III. Parental Disapproval | IV. Child Exposure | V. Peer Use† | VI. Deviant Peer | VII. Contextual Risk | |
Child marijuana use onset predicted by: (OR) | |||||||
Antecedent: | |||||||
Parent adolescent marijuana use | 1.34 | 1.31 | 1.29 | 1.33 | 1.34 | 1.13 | 1.19 |
Mediators: | |||||||
1. Parental monitoring | -- | 0.87 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
2. Parental disapproval | -- | -- | 0.82 | -- | -- | -- | -- |
3. Child exposure to | -- | -- | -- | 1.30 | -- | -- | -- |
4. Peer use | -- | -- | -- | -- | 3.10*** | -- | -- |
5. Deviant peer | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 2.47*** | -- |
6. Contextual risk | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 2.42*** |
Controls: | |||||||
Child gender (male = 1) | 2.14* | 1.97 M | 2.16* | 2.30* | 3.33** | 1.78 | 2.64** |
Child alcohol onset | 1.68 | 1.67 | 1.55 | 1.48 | 0.76 | 1.51 | 0.93 |
Indirect effect of parent use on child onset via mediator | -- | 1.02 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 1.22 | 1.23* | 1.29** |
Mediator predicted by: (standardized beta) | |||||||
Parent use | -- | −0.17 M | −0.18 | 0.18* | 0.18 M | 0.23* | 0.29*** |
Note: OR = Odds ratio.
An alternative model that also controlled for child deviant peer association was fit to the data; results indicated that child deviant peer association marginally predicted child marijuana use onset (OR = 1.74, p = .054) but did not attenuate the effect of child peer marijuana use on child marijuana use onset (OR = 2.54, p = .001).
p < .10.
p < .05.
p < .01
p < .001.