Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Econ. 2015 Feb 18;25(4):391–407. doi: 10.1002/hec.3159

Table 5.

Regression results for screening in past year by income as a percent of federal poverty

(1) (2) (3) (4)
<250% <150% 150-300% >=300%
FPL FPL FPL FPL
Panel A. Mammography sample
Mass*reform 0.0447 (0.0454) −0.0475 (0.0592) 0.0779 (0.0539) −0.0187 (0.0271)
Mass*post 0.0563* (0.0334) −0.0289 (0.0471) 0.0709* (0.0376) 0.0192 (0.0200)

Mass baseline screening rate 69.2% 71.3% 69.6% 78.2%

N (unweighted) 9795 4512 8219 18757

Panel B. Pap test sample
Mass*reform −0.00933 (0.0297) −0.0172 (0.0388) −0.0225 (0.0384) −0.00623 (0.0172)
Mass*post 0.0610*** (0.0226) 0.0647** (0.0327) 0.0494** (0.0234) 0.0438*** (0.0141)

Mass baseline screening rate 71.0% 70.6% 72.9% 79.4%

N (unweighted) 22901 11329 18516 36047

Notes: Survey-weighted standard errors in parentheses. All models also include year and state dummies, individual demographic controls, and a constant (coefficients not shown). Mass = Massachusetts.

***

p<0.01

**

p<0.05

*

p<0.1