Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Care Women Int. 2015 Feb 18;37(3):301–322. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2015.1017641

TABLE 4.

Percent reporting frequent school absence and reason for absence by condition and year.

2008 (Wave 2) 2009 (Wave 3) 2010 (Wave 4) 2012 (Wave 5)
Variable Intervention Controla Intervention Controla Intervention Controla Intervention Controla
Number frequently absentb /
number reporting currently
attending school
(%)
12/166
(7.2%)
23/129
(17.8%)
10/165
(6.1%)
33/105
(31.4%)
8/158
(5.1%)
25/94
(26.6%)
8/142
(5.6%)
11/86
(12.8%)
Rao-Scott chi-square for group 5.19* 1.52** 22.47** 4.73*
difference in frequent absencec
Reason for absenced
(n used for analysis)
(n=12) (n=23) (n=10) (n=33) (n=8) (n=25) (n=8) (n=10e)
 Cannot pay school fee 0.0 39.1 0.0 60.6 0.0 80.0 0.0 40.0
 Do not have school clothes 0.0 4.4 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
 Do not have school supplies 8.3 13.0 0.0 15.2 0.0 4.0 37.5 20.0
 Caring for children 33.3 4.4 40.0 0.0 25.0 4.0 0.0 0.0
 Illness 58.3 30.4 40.0 18.2 37.5 4.0 62.5 40.0
 School too far away 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0
 Other reason 0.0 8.7 20.0 3.0 37.5 4.0 0.0 0.0
 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
a

No treatment control during 2007-2010 and delayed partial intervention during 2011-2012.

b

At waves 2 through 4, responses of “2 or 3 days a month” or more often in past year (versus once a month or less) were coded as “frequent absence.” At Wave 5, frequent absence refers to “2 or 3 days a month” or more often in past term.

c

Modified Rao-Scott chi-square computing design correction using null hypothesis cell proportions together with the cell design effects.

d

Limited to participants reporting frequent absence in the survey wave.

e

N is 10 instead of the 11 respondents with frequent absence listed above due to missing data.

*

p<.05,

**

p<.001