Table 3.

Multivariable logistic regression models (Model A: Without low health literacy; Model B: With low health literacy) for Asians overall vs. White predicting receiving recommended screening in the 2007 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS)

	Received Mammography		Received Pap
	Unweighted n = 11,163		Unweighted n = 15,210
	Model		Model
	A	B	A	B
	OR (95 % CI)	OR (95 % CI)	OR (95 % CI)	OR (95 % CI)
Low health literacy	–	0.72 (0.57–0.90)	–	0.71 (0.60–0.83)
Race/ethnicity
White	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference
Asian	0.75 (0.57–0.97)	0.75 (0.58–0.98)	0.36 (0.31–0.42)	0.36 (0.31–0.42)
Demographics
LEP	0.83 (0.58–1.20)	0.89 (0.62–1.30)	0.77 (0.60–0.99)	0.83 (0.64–1.07)
Education
<HS	0.52 (0.36–0.73)	0.54 (0.38–0.77)	0.49 (0.37–0.66)	0.52 (0.39–0.69)
HS/Some college	0.79 (0.61–1.01)	0.79 (0.61–1.02)	0.57 (0.47–0.69)	0.58 (0.48–0.70)
College	0.87 (0.66–1.15)	0.87 (0.66–1.15)	0.84 (0.69–1.03)	0.84 (0.69–1.03)
Graduate degree	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference
Age	1.04 (0.93–1.18)	1.04 (0.92–1.17)	0.79 (0.75–0.83)	0.78 (0.75–0.82)
Below/near poverty	0.69 (0.52–0.92)	0.72 (0.54–0.95)	0.68 (0.56–0.82)	0.70 (0.58–0.85)
Rural	0.92 (0.69–1.22)	0.91 (0.68–1.21)	0.80 (0.65–0.99)	0.80 (0.64–0.98)
Insured	5.07 (4.04–6.35)	5.01 (4.00–6.28)	2.85 (2.47–3.28)	2.84 (2.47–3.28)
Married	1.56 (1.32–1.85)	1.56 (1.32–1.84)	1.92 (1.70–2.18)	1.92 (1.70–2.18)
Context variables
Distance/supply	0.99 (0.97–1.01)	0.99 (0.97–1.01)	1.00 (0.99–1.01)	1.00 (0.99–1.01)
% Elder poverty	0.38 (0.02–7.06)	0.38 (0.02–6.88)	0.50 (0.04–5.70)	0.53 (0.05–6.03)
% Community Asian density	3.64 (1.33–9.98)	3.66 (1.34–10.02)	4.23 (1.71–10.47)	4.32 (1.75–10.67)