Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 6;16:72. doi: 10.1186/s10194-015-0556-y

Table 1.

Literature prevalence of migraine in patients with epilepsy

Authors Sample M/F Age Methods Results
N of pts yrs Migraine
Schon and Blau 1987 [5] 100 39/61 32 mean Interview 9 %
Ottman and Lipton 1994 [6] 1948 40 %/60 % ≥18 Structured telephone interviews + medical records review for 60 % of probands 24 %
Ito and Shachter 1996 [7] 162 82/80 19-65 range Questionnaires mailed to the subjects + medical records review NAa
Ito et al. 1999 [8] 109 36/73 38 ± 12 meanb Questionnaire + interview + medical records review 12.8 %
Velioglu and Ozmenoglu 1999[9] 412 212/200 15-70 range Interview with a standardized questionnaire 14 %
Leniger et al. 2001 [10] 341 154/187 40 ± 15 mean Interview with a standardized questionnaire 18.2 %
Karaali Savrun et al. 2002 [11] 135 80/55 ≥10 Questionnaire administered to patients 14.8 %
Förderreuther et al. 2002 [12] 110 69/41 35.2 mean Semi-standardized interview 10 %b
Ito et al. 2004 [13] 364 163/201 12-81 range Structured interview with standardized questionnaire 8 %
Syvertsen et al. 2007 [14] 109 44/65 20-71 range Questionnaire + semi-structured telephonic interview 20 %
Kwan et al. 2008 [15] 227 98/129 36.0 ± 11.3 mean Interview with standardized questionnaire + seizures and headache diary over the 3-month observation period + final interview 6.6 %b
HELP Study Group 2010 [16] 597 348/249 ≥13 Questionnaire at initial visit 12.4 %
Tonini et al. 2012 [17] 492c 154/338 ≥18 Direct interview with questionnaire 18.3 %b
Duchaczek et al. 2012 [18] 201 106/95 ≥18 Semi-structured interview 11 %
Winawer et al. 2013 [19] 730d 285/445 ≥12 Telephone or in-person interview + medical record abstraction 25.2 %e
Gameleira et al. 2013 [20] 304 141/163 4-88 range Patients evaluated at the epilepsy clinic 32.9 %f
Wang et al. 2014 [21] 1109 607/502 ≥18 Self-administered questionnaire + standardized semi-structured telephone interview 12.53 %

N, number; pts, patients; M, males; F, females; yrs, years; NA, not available

aa prevalence of inter-ictal migraine is not clearly identifiable; the authors report a prevalence of inter-ictal headache in 64 % of patients, approximately a half of them with a pounding quality and almost 70 % of them often accompanied by nausea and/or vomiting, photophobia or phonophobia

bcalculated by the authors

cthis multicenter study involved 1167 patients from epilepsy and headache centers, we considered only patients with epilepsy

d371 probands, 231 siblings, 128 parents: all with epilepsy; e23.5 % probands, 22.5 % siblings, 35.2 % parents

fthe authors of the study does not distinguish between inter-ictal migraine and post-ictal headache with migrainous features