Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 5;17(5):604–612. doi: 10.1007/s10126-015-9647-7

Table 5.

Comparison of the countable traits between RCC, 4nF1 and G1

Fish type No. lateral line scales No. of scales above the lateral line No. of scales below the lateral line No. of dorsal fins rays No. of abdominal fins rays No. of anal fins rays
RCC 29.20 ± 0.70a (28–30) 5.60 ± 0.50a (5–6) 5.70 ± 0.47a (5–6) III + 18.65 ± 0.49a (18–19) 8.55 ± 0.51a (8–9) III + 5.65 ± 0.49a (5–6)
4nF1 31.65 ± 0.49b (31–32) 6.55 ± 0.51b (6–7) 6.45 ± 0.51b (6–7) III + 18.70 ± 0.98a (17–20) 8.60 ± 0.50a (8–9) III + 6.40 ± 0.68b (5–7)
G1 31.34 ± 0.43b (31–32) 5.75 ± 0.23a (5–6) 5.73 ± 0.27a (5–6) III + 18.2 ± 0.87a (17–19) 9.12 ± 0.26b (9–10) III + 6.57 ± 0.36b (6–7)

The same superscript letters in the same column indicate no significant difference (P > 0.01); different superscript letters in the same column indicate significant difference (P < 0.01); Ш represents hard fin rays and Arabic numerals represent soft fin ray; mean value ± standard deviation; the numbers in brackets indicate range for the value