Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 22;27(7):2035–2038. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.2035

Table 3. Comparison of the adjusted mean and 95% CI of outcome measures (adjusted for baseline using ANCOVA) at each assessment time.

Outcomes Short-term effectiveness
(after 2 weeks of treatment)
Long-term effectiveness
(12 weeks follow-up)


BCP CON Difference
(95% CI)
BCP CON Difference
(95% CI)
NRS (scores) 1.8 4.1* 2.3 (1.6 to 2.9) 1.1 4.4* 3.4 (2.6 to 4.1)
LROM-flexion (mm) 19.5 18.3* −1.3 (−1.5 to −1.0) 20.3 18.7* −1.5 (−1.9 to −1.1)
LROM-extension (mm) 13.1 14.0* 0.9 (0.7 to 1.2) 12.7 14.0* 1.4 (1.1 to 1.6)
RMDQ (scores) 5.3 12.3* 7.0 (5.3 to 8.7) 1.8 10.3* 8.5 (6.9 to 10.2)

BCP: Back care pillow group; CON: Control group; SD: Standard deviation; NRS: Numerical rating scale; LROM: Lumbar range of motion; RMDQ: Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. * Significant difference between BCP and CON (p<0.001).