Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 22;27(7):2053–2056. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.2053

Table 2. Comparison between standard and early intervention groups.

Standard
intervention
group
Early
intervention
group
Patients, n (male/female) 33 (26/7) 38 (23/15)
Age, years 80.5 ± 6.1 82.2 ± 7.6
Body mass index 20.06 ± 1.8 20.1 ± 2.5
Interval until the start of physiotherapy, days 10.27 ± 3.03 1.63 ± 1.03
Admission period, days 37.7 ± 13.8 31.7 ± 16.7
ICU admission period, days 15.45 ± 3.76 12.03 ± 4.14 **
CURB-65 score / n 3 / 11 3 / 14
4 / 12 4 / 11
5 / 10 5 / 13
FIM before admission 81.9 ± 12.7 81.9 ± 7.04
Locomotory domain 56.8 ± 10.9 57.7 ± 5.8
Cognitive domain 25.3 ± 2.6 24.2 ± 2.5
FIM on dischargem 61.4 ± 16.7 67.6 ± 9.2
Locomotory domain 41.5 ± 12.6 46.9 ± 8.4 *
Cognitive domain 18.4 ± 4.5 19.5 ± 3.3
Rate of change in FIM 20.3 ± 7.6 14.3 ± 5.7 **
Locomotory domain 15.3 ± 7.1 10.8 ± 5.3 *
Cognitive domain 6.6 ± 2.8 4.7 ± 2.2 **

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise indicated. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. ICU: intensive care unit, CURB-65: The Confusion, Urea, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, and age >65, FIM: Functional Independence Measure