Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 29;56(5):1296–1306. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.5.1296

Supplementary Table 2. Diagnostic Accuracy of DKK-1, AFP, and DCP in Diagnosing Early-Stage HCC.

AUC 95% CI Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) +LR -LR
Early-stage HCC (TNM I-II) vs. all controls
 DKK-1 0.818 0.768-0.868 89.0 62.9 69.7 85.6 2.40 0.18
 AFP 0.772 0.714-0.830 61.8 89.5 84.8 71.4 5.91 0.43
 DCP 0.777 0.721-0.833 59.2 93.5 90.3 69.1 9.14 0.44
 DKK-1 plus AFP 0.893 0.857-0.928 86.2 76.2 77.6 85.2 3.62 0.18
 DKK-1 plus DCP 0.908 0.876-0.941 76.2 90.5 89.3 78.5 8.03 0.26
 DKK-1 plus AFP plus DCP 0.939 0.913-0.964 84.6 90.5 90.3 84.9 8.92 0.17
Early-stage HCC (BCLC A-B) vs. all controls
 DKK-1 0.811 0.760-0.862 85.0 62.9 69.1 81.2 2.29 0.24
 AFP 0.772 0.714-0.830 61.6 89.5 84.9 71.0 5.89 0.43
 DCP 0.783 0.728-0.838 60.4 93.5 90.6 69.5 9.33 0.42
 DKK-1 plus AFP 0.891 0.855-0.927 83.7 76.2 77.4 82.7 3.51 0.21
 DKK-1 plus DCP 0.910 0.878-0.942 75.9 90.5 89.4 78.0 7.99 0.27
 DKK-1 plus AFP plus DCP 0.940 0.915-0.965 84.1 90.5 90.4 84.4 8.87 0.18
Early-stage HCC (TNM I-II) vs. all controls except healthy subjects
 DKK-1 0.818 0.768-0.868 89.0 63.1 75.9 81.4 2.41 0.17
 AFP 0.772 0.714-0.830 61.4 85.8 84.8 63.4 4.33 0.45
 DCP 0.777 0.721-0.833 59.2 91.9 91.3 61.1 7.32 0.44
 DKK-1 plus AFP 0.893 0.857-0.928 85.5 75.7 82.1 80.0 3.52 0.19
 DKK-1 plus DCP 0.908 0.876-0.941 76.2 8.7 90.8 71.7 6.72 0.27
 DKK-1 plus AFP plus DCP 0.939 0.913-0.964 84.6 88.7 91.7 79.6 7.46 0.17
Early-stage HCC by (BCLC A-B) vs. all controls except healthy subjects
 DKK-1 0.811 0.760-0.862 85.0 63.1 75.3 76.1 2.30 0.24
 AFP 0.772 0.714-0.830 61.6 85.8 84.9 63.4 4.35 0.45
 DCP 0.783 0.728-0.838 60.4 91.9 91.6 61.5 7.48 0.43
 DKK-1 plus AFP 0.891 0.855-0.927 83.0 75.7 81.9 77.1 6.41 0.22
 DKK-1 plus DCP 0.910 0.878-0.942 75.9 88.7 90.9 71.1 6.69 0.27
 DKK-1 plus AFP plus DCP 0.940 0.915-0.965 84.1 88.7 91.7 78.9 7.42 0.18

DKK-1, dickkopf-1; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; DCP, des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin; AUC, area under receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; LR, likelihood ratio; TNM, Tumor-Node-Metastasis; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer.

The optimum predicted probabilities of DKK-1, AFP, DCP, and their combination were derived from their respective ROC curves by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity and minimizing the overall error.