Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 20;15(7):17507–17533. doi: 10.3390/s150717507

Table 1.

Comparison between the previous methods and the proposed method of emotion recognition.

Category Method Advantages Disadvantage
Using a single modality Visible-light camera-based methods [3,4,5,6]. User’s emotion is recognized based on facial expression in an image. - Providing comfort to the user without the attachment of sensors.
- Less expensive method than bio-signal or thermal camera-based methods.
- Analyzing emotion is difficult if the person has no expression.
- Extraction of the facial feature points can be affected by non-uniform illumination.
Thermal camera-based methods [7,12]. Measuring the change of facial temperature according to emotion. - Providing comfort to the user without the attachment of sensors.
- Analyzing emotion is easy, even if the person has no expression.
- Extraction of the facial feature points is not affected by illumination condition.
- More expensive method than visible-light camera-based method.
- Difficult to detect regions of facial features because the texture of facial features is not distinct in the thermal image.
Voice-based methods [2,8,9]. Measuring the change of voice features according to emotion. Less expensive method than bio-signal or thermal camera-based method. - The performance can be affected by surrounding noises.
Physiological signal-based methods [10,11,16,17,18]. ECG [10] and EEG [11,16,17,18] are analyzed for emotion detection. High accuracy of emotion detection and fast speed of data acquisition. - More discomfort to the user because sensors are attached to the body.
- More influenced by the motion of the head, body and muscles than camera- or voice-based methods.
Using multiple modalities Multiple physiological signal-based methods [13,14,15]. - Using EEG, heart rate, SC, respiration, ST and psychometrical ratings [13].
- Using PPG, EMG, ECG, GSR and ST [14].
- Using SC, blood volume pressure, ST, EMG and respiration [15].
Higher accuracy of emotion detection compared to single modality-based methods. - More discomfort to the user because many sensors are attached to the body.
- More influenced by the motion of the head, body and muscles than single modality-based methods.
Hybrid method using both physiological signals and non-intrusive camera-based methods (proposed method). Using facial temperature, EEG, blinking rate and subjective evaluation for evaluating fear. - Higher accuracy of emotion evaluation compared to single modality-based methods.
- More comfort to the user and higher freedom of movement without the attachment of sensors, except for a wireless EEG device.
- Facial feature positions on the thermal image can be easily detected using dual (visible-light and thermal) cameras.
Larger amount of data to be processed after acquiring the image sequences by dual cameras.