Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 6;17(9):1173–1177. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu259

Table 2.

Generalized Estimating Equations Predicting Latency to Smoke in Minutes

Steps and predictors B SE (B) 95% CI p
Step 1: main effects
 Time 1 Trails B 0.09 0.32 −0.53 to 0.71 .78
 Change in Trails B 0.37 0.20 −0.03 to 0.77 .07
 Time 1 urge −0.07 0.11 −0.29 to 0.14 .49
 Change in urge −0.28 0.09 −0.45 to −0.10 .002
Step 2: interactions
 Time 1 Trails B −0.07 0.32 −0.69 to 0.55 .82
 Change in Trails B 0.21 0.22 −0.23 to 0.65 .35
 Time 1 urge −0.08 0.10 −0.28 to 0.12 .45
 Change in urge −1.45 0.44 −2.30 to 0.59 .0009
 Change in Trails B by change in urge 0.02 0.01 −0.008 to 0.04 .17
 Time 1 Trails B by change in urge 0.02 0.008 0.007 to 0.04 .005

Note. Analyses include alcohol dose and session number, both ns; variables were not centered; Trails scores are t-scores; urge is measured on a 0 (low) to 100 (high) scale; change in Trails B = Trails B t-score postdrink administration minus Time 1 Trails B t-score; change in urge = urge postdrink administration minus Time 1 urge score.