Table III.

The Unstandardized Coefficients and Standard Errors for all Parameters, and the Bias-Corrected Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for the Indirect Effects

Estimated parameters	Unstandardized coefficients	SE	p	BC bootstrap, 95% CIs for indirect effects
Direct effects (individual level)
Rituals P → Cohesion P	0.72	0.07	<.001
Rituals P → Hope P	0.27	0.11	.016
Cohesion P → QoL P	0.18	0.03	<.001
Hope P → QoL P	0.13	0.02	<.001
Rituals C → Cohesion C	0.54	0.06	<.001
Rituals C → Hope C	0.22	0.08	.009
Cohesion C → QoL C	2.38	1.14	.036
Hope C → QoL C	4.11	0.84	<.001
Direct effects (dyadic level)
Rituals P → Cohesion C	0.12	0.06	.033
Covariances
Rituals P ↔ Rituals C	0.09	0.01	<.001
e (Cohesion P) ↔ e (Hope P)	0.21	0.04	<.001
e (Cohesion C) ↔ e (Hope C)	0.12	0.02	<.001
e (Cohesion P) ↔ e (Cohesion C)	0.11	0.02	<.001
e (Hope P) ↔ e (Hope C)	0.15	0.05	.002
e (Cohesion P) ↔ e (Hope C)	0.05	0.03	.084
e (Hope P) ↔ e (Cohesion C)	0.04	0.03	.190
e (QoL P) ↔ e (QoL C)	0.41	0.32	.190
Indirect effects (individual level
Rituals P → QoL P (via Cohesion P)	0.13	0.03	<.001	[0.08, 0.19]
Rituals P → QoL P (via Hope P)	0.03	0.02	.011	[0.01, 0.07]
Rituals C → QoL C (via Cohesion C)	0.30	0.62	.028	[0.15, 2.61]
Rituals C → QoL C (via Hope C)	0.89	0.40	.006	[0.25, 1.81]
Indirect effects (dyadic level)
Rituals P → QoL C (via Cohesion C)	0.28	0.19	.031	[0.02, 0.81]
Differences of strength of indirect effects (individual level)
Rituals P → QoL P (via Cohesion P) ≠	0.10	0.03	.004	[0.04, 0.16]
Rituals P → QoL P (via Hope P)
Rituals C → HRQoL C (via Cohesion C) ≠	0.40	0.77	.632	[−1.22, 1.83]
Rituals C → HRQoL C (via Hope C)

Note. BC = bias-corrected bootstrap; CIs = confidence intervals.