Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 25;61(5):800–806. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ495

Table 2.

Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk Illustration: Participant Data and Data Summaries

Participant Treatment Arm Overall Clinical Outcomea Days of Antibiotic Use DOOR No. of Control Participants (n = 13) With a Lower DOOR
A New 2 5 11 9
B New 1 3 1 13
C New 1 4 2 13
D New 2 4 10 9
E New 3 3 19 4
F New 2 3 9 9
G New 3 5 21 4
H New 3 4 20 4
I New 1 7 5 12
J New 3 8 23 3
K New 2 6 12 9
L New 1 5 3 13
M New 2 8 14.5 7.5
N Control 3 12 26 Sum = 109.5
O Control 2 7 13
P Control 1 9 7
Q Control 2 8 14.5
R Control 3 6 22
S Control 2 11 18
T Control 1 10 8
U Control 2 9 16
V Control 3 9 24
W Control 1 6 4
X Control 1 8 6
Y Control 2 10 17
Z Control 3 10 25

The probability of a better DOOR for a randomly selected participant from the new strategy compared with the old strategy is the number of between-treatment pairwise comparisons in which the new treatment has a higher DOOR than the control (109.5), divided by the total number of possible pairwise comparisons (169), resulting in 64.8% (95% confidence interval, 57%–71%).

Abbreviations: AE, adverse effects; DOOR, desirability of outcome ranking.

a Overall clinical outcome coding: 1, success without AE; 2, success with AE; 3, failure.