Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 14;3(8):apps.1500039. doi: 10.3732/apps.1500039

Table 1.

Statistics for the target enrichment experiment.a

Accession Percent on-target Mean (±SD) of low-copy locus coverage Mean low-copy locus completeness (%)b Mean exon completeness (%)c Mean intron completeness (%)c Percent chloroplast reads Chloroplast coverage Chloroplast completeness (%) Percent mitochondrial reads Mitochondrial coveraged Mitochondrial completeness (%)
Heuchera abramsii 54.7 173.5× (±75.4×) 99.8 100.0 99.6 7.8 31.8× 98.3 1.0 4.5× 44.0
H. acutifolia (herbarium specimen) 44.5 206.0× (±76.5×) 99.8 99.9 99.3 3.8 22.0× 95.3 1.5 7.2× 66.3
H. americana var. americana 58.7 178.9× (±52.5×) 99.9 99.9 99.5 3.7 14.8× 96.6 1.1 3.7× 52.7
H. elegans 54.8 464.6× (±136.5×) 99.9 100.0 99.9 3.4 38.6× 99.7 0.4 4.7× 47.1
H. grossulariifolia var. grossulariifolia 59.6 262.3× (±70.3×) 100.0 100.0 99.7 6.4 36.9× 99.4 0.9 4.5× 58.5
H. missouriensis 60.5 586.1× (±112.1×) 100.0 99.8 100.0 4.2 63.4× 99.8 0.6 4.9× 81.3
H. parishii 47.3 922.9× (±236.3×) 99.9 100.0 100.0 3.8 99.8× 99.8 0.4 8.2× 64.2
H. parviflora var. parviflora 60.6 1225.7× (±242.9×) 100.0 100.0 100.0 6.7 220.2× 99.7 1.1 17.8× 85.3
H. parvifolia var. nivalis 52.8 714.9× (±168.1×) 100.0 100.0 100.0 3.0 51.8× 99.7 1.0 9.4× 84.7
H. puberula 55.0 440.4× (±93.5×) 100.0 100.0 100.0 4.0 47.3× 99.8 0.9 6.6× 73.1
H. pulchella 47.8 1303.8× (±254.1×) 99.9 100.0 100.0 5.5 219.3× 99.9 0.7 13.1× 90.8
H. rubescens var. versicolor 55.8 321.3× (±79.6×) 99.9 100.0 99.9 2.4 17.6× 99.5 0.4 3.5× 42.6
H. villosa var. villosa 62.6 361.9× (±76.6×) 100.0 100.0 99.9 2.9 24.7× 99.1 0.6 3.5× 61.4
H. wootonii 55.7 275.9× (±72.6×) 99.8 99.9 99.6 2.8 17.9× 99.1 0.9 4.8× 60.2
Mitella pentandra 49.8 238.9× (±91.7×) 99.6 99.6 98.5 7.2 41.3× 98.6 1.6 6.6× 70.2
a

For all calculations, locus four has been omitted.

b

Locus completeness is based on coverage of the reference sequences.

c

Region completeness figures are based on the percent of the H. parviflora reference to which reads could be mapped.

d

Coverage of the mitochondrion only counts areas where reads could be mapped. If this calculation included the whole mitochondrion, it would be unfairly down-weighted by long regions (up to tens of thousands of bases) of uncertain origin that are not shared across species.