Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Eat Disord. 2015 May 27;48(6):692–699. doi: 10.1002/eat.22431

Table 2.

Differences between the four clusters based on EDI-Drive for Thinness (DT) and CBCL-Anxious/Depressed (A/D) scores in self-reported history of anorexia nervosa (AN) or bulimia nervosa (BN) among unrelated females who participated in both Waves 3 and 4 (n=412)

Mean (SD) for quantitative criteria and percentage for binary Comparison between
clusters
412 unrelated girls aged 16–17 Mild
(1)
77%
(n=320)
DT
(2)
10.4%
(n=43)
A/D
(3)
9.9%
(n=41)
DT-A/D
(4)
1.9%
(n=8)
p-value/
1Test Value
2Contrasts
(p<.05)
EDI – Drive for Thinness 1.19 (1.52) 11.16 (3.59) 1.54 (1.96) 15.75 (3.5) <.001/466.5 1=3<2<4
CBCL – Anxious-Depressive 0.94 (1.24) 1.35 (1.53) 9.32 (3.64) 10.63 (4.34) <.001/343.4 1=2<3=4

Wave 3 (16–17 years old) cross-sectional eating disorders

History of AN (2.4%; n=10/412) 1.3%
(n=4)
4.7%
(n=2)
4.9%
(n=2)
25%
(n=2)
<.001/22.4 1<2,3,4
History of BN (1.2%; n=5/412) 0.6%
(n=2)
4.7%
(n=2)
0.0%
(n=0)
12.5%
(n=1)
<.01/14.17 1<2,4

Wave 4 (19–20 years old) prospective eating disorders

History of AN (4.4%; n=18/412) 3.8%
(n=12)
2.3%
(n=1)
2.4%
(n=1)
50.0%
(n=4)
<.001/40.9 1,2,3<4
History of BN (2.4%; n=10/412) 0.9%
(n=3)
9.3%
(n=4)
2.4%
(n=1)
25.0%
(n=2)
<.001/28.8 1<2,4

Abbreviations: EDI: Eating Disorders Inventory; CBCL: Child Behavior Checklist

1

Test values: Kruskal Wallis and Pearson chi-squared tests (3 degrees of freedom)

2

Contrasts: Mann Whitney U