Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 1;89:93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.01.018

Table 2.

Logistic regression models indicating the odds ratio of selecting fruit by randomized group in Study 1 and Study 2.

Study 1
OR (95% CI)
Study 2, model 1
OR (95% CI)
Study 2, model 2
OR (95% CI)
(Intercept) 2.92 (1.87–4.62)*** 1.26 (1.05–1.51)* 1.27 (1.10–1.47)**
Prime (ref no prime) 1.11 (0.60–2.04) 0.95 (0.74–1.20) 0.923 (0.83–1.03)
Restraint (ref low restraint) 1.07 (0.72–1.59) 0.95 (0.80–1.13) 0.98 (0.87–1.11)
Some hunger (ref no hunger) 0.38 (0.25–0.56)*** 0.91 (0.78–1.06) 0.845 (0.76–0.95)**
Load (ref no load) 0.86 (0.58–1.25) n/a n/a
Order (ref food preference first) n/a 1.18 (1.06–1.31)** 1.18 (1.05–1.31)**
Prime × restraint 0.72 (0.41–1.27) 1.07 (0.83–1.37) n/a
Prime × hunger 2.29 (1.33–3.96)** 0.87 (0.70–1.08) n/a
Prime × load 0.88 (0.51–1.51) n/a n/a

Study 2: model 1 contains interaction terms, model 2 contains no interaction terms.

*

p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.