Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 10;17(1):4–17. doi: 10.1007/s11307-014-0759-7

Table 1.

Comparison of the imaging modalities

Imaging modality Resolution (μm) Sensitivity Key features
Optical 2,000 pM–fM

Two-dimensional

Limited depth of penetration

Molecular and functional imaging

Mice (nude or non-pigmented) only

PET 1,500–2,000 nM–pM

Three-dimensional

Short- and long-lived isotopes

Molecular and functional imaging

SPECT 100–200a nM–pM

Three-dimensional

Potential for imaging multiple probes simultaneously

Molecular and functional imaging

CT 30+ μM

Three-dimensional

Primarily bone and lung imaging

Soft tissue imaging requires contrast agents

Anatomical imaging

Ultrasound 30+ μM

Two-dimensional

Depth of penetration dependent on transducer frequency

User dependent due to manual manipulation of transducers

Anatomical imaging

MRI 10+ μM

Three-dimensional

No ionizing radiation

Anatomical imagingb

aResolution is scanner dependent

bPotential for functional imaging using contrast agents