Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 14;407(22):6593–6617. doi: 10.1007/s00216-015-8858-0

Table 4.

Method III: droplet deposition on confined, circular, and hydrophilic areas

Sample Matrix Droplet volume Size of dried residue Sample loading Surface material LOD Reproducibility Additional information Ref.
Photo-resistant used in photolithography 64.7 pL 150 μm 4 × 10−6 μL μm−2 PDMS-columns (micro-machined) 2.33, 15.4, 5.72 ng mL−1 (Al, Cu, Pb) 17.1–46.9 % RSD (due to extremely low sample volume) No matrix added, photo resist [164]
Human urine from supposedly healthy patients 300 μL 16 mm 10−6 μL μm−2 Filter paper (precut saturated filter disks) 0.1–13 μg L−1 2–5 % RSD No additive [160]
Cu isotopes in urine of Wilson’s disease patients, treated patients and one control patient 300 μL 16 mm 10−6 μL μm−2 Filter paper (precut saturated filter disks) 200–500 ppm RSD intra-spot, and 540  ppm RSD inter-spot No additive, corona ablation with 10 kHz [18]
Phosphorus in fermentation media 10 μL 5 mm 5 × 10−7 μL μm−2 Filter paper (precut saturated filter disks) 10 μg mL−1 (ICP-OES detection) 10 % RSD Analysis via laser ablation ICP-OES [165]

aSample volume / area of dried residue (assuming a circular spot)