Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jun 6;47(3):242–250. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.04.010

Table 2.

Comparison of intervention and control group outcomes by measure and time period, a n=503

Follow-up survey Measure Intervention (SE) (n=262) Control (SE) (n=241) Relative risk (95% CI)
Primary outcome Biochemically confirmed repeated point prevalence abstinence 11.1% (0.02) 5.0% (0.01) 2.22 (1.16, 4.26)*
Self–reported repeated point prevalence abstinenceb 19.9% (0.02) 10.0% (0.02) 1.99 (1.27, 3.13)**
Biochemically confirmed abstinence 15.7% (0.02) 11.2% (0.02) 1.40 (0.89, 2.20)
Secondary outcomes 6 months Not smoked in the past 7 days (%) 31.7% (0.03) 20.8% (0.03) 1.53(1.13, 2.07)**
Not smoked in the past 30 days (%) 24.8% (0.03) 15.8% (0.02) 1.57 (1.10, 2.26)*
3 months Not smoked in the past 7 days (%) 33.2% (0.03) 19.9% (0.03) 1.67 (1.23, 2.26)**
Not smoked in the past 30 days (%) 27.5% (0.03) 16.2% (0.02) 1.70 (1.20, 2.41)**
1 month Not smoked in the past 7 days (%) 30.5% (0.03) 14.5% (0.02) 2.10 (1.47, 3.00)***
Not smoked in the past 30 days (%) 11.8% (0.02) 7.5% (0.02) 1.58 (0.91, 2.76)

Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance

a

Chi-square analyses were conducted to examine outcomes across the intervention and control groups. Unadjusted risk ratios are presented. Missing data were imputed to indicate smoking.

b

Self–reported repeated point prevalence abstinence is defined as not smoking in the past 30 days at 3- and 6-month follow-ups.

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001.