Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Aug 18;22(9):1096–1102. doi: 10.1111/acem.12736

Table 1.

*: Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods

Characteristic Qualitative Quantitative
Characteristic of construct or concept under study Constructs, concepts are unfamiliar, poorly defined, or not well understood in new populations/contexts. Constructs, concepts are clearly defined.
Main goals of study Gaining meaning, in-depth investigation.
Studying selected issues, cases, or events in detail.
Obtaining detailed numerical descriptions or functions of a representative sample.
Finding generalizable results and making comparison across populations.
Type of measurement Exploratory, formative, confirmatory. Structured, hypothesis-driven, with intent to test hypotheses.
Characteristics of data collection Flexible approach to allow for in-depth characterizations/understandings, and/or discovery of the unexpected.
Questions posed to participants can be refined in the course of study.
Typically concludes when data “saturation” has been met, and/or no new information is emerging.
Validated, repeatability of measurements is important.
Research questions (i.e., hypotheses) and measures decided a priori and not subject to change.
Concludes at an established sample size or time.
Characteristics of data analysis Iterative, used to modify research questions for ongoing study. Constructed a priori, not influenced by data collection.
*

Adapted from materials from Kathleen Morrow and Rochelle Rosen, Centers for Behavioral & Preventive Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI