Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Aug 18;22(9):1096–1102. doi: 10.1111/acem.12736

Table 2.

Common Qualitative Data Collection Methods

Technique Advantages Challenges Example(s) of Use
Participant observation
  • Provides insight into a specific culture or setting.

  • Useful when information provided in interviews/questionnaires differ from actual behavior or beliefs.

  • Captures full complexity of a health event or behavior, including roots, interconnectedness, and meaning.

  • Minimizes observer’s influence on data obtained.

  • Time consuming.

  • Gaining entry may be challenging.

  • Researchers may be unable to obtain context behind observed behaviors using observation alone.

  • Observation and content analysis of verbal instructions provided at ED discharge for asthma.

Open-ended interviewing
  • Efficient: key informant likely to have insight in many aspects of the issue.

  • Careful purposive sampling necessary to identify appropriate informants and ensure they are representative.

  • Interviews with ED clinicians to determine the barriers faced in managing children with asthma. prior to designing an ED-based intervention.

Semi-structured interviewing
  • Collaborative effort between investigator and participant to gain in-depth understanding of an issue.

  • Allows discussion of sensitive/private topics.

  • May take significant time to collect an appropriate population and range of narratives and viewpoints (esp. compared to focus groups).

  • Exit interviews after participation in an RCT with questioning designed to determine acceptability and cultural sensitivity of an asthma intervention.

Cognitive interviewing
  • Important step in survey development and validation.

  • Development of intervention materials (video, pamphlets, etc.).

  • Iterative process required.

  • Analysis of a planned asthma data collection instrument at an item-by-item level using participant feedback.

Focus groups
  • Allows exploration of different experiences and opinions.

  • Focus group as unit of measure promotes group discussion / collaboration.

  • May not be appropriate for sensitive topics.

  • Logistically more difficult to coordinate than interviews.

  • Typically cannot achieve the same depth of understanding of individual concepts as you can in individual interviews.

  • Thematic analysis of the collective experience of parents whose children had a prolonged delay in asthma diagnosis.