Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 20;50(4):1021–1042. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12282

Table 2.

Multivariable Model of the Likelihood of Reporting a Decrease from Survivor-Focused or General Care Baseline to No Care at Most Recent Follow-Up*,

Baseline Predictor Variables OR§ (95% CI) p-value
Gender
 Male 2.3 (1.8–2.9) <.001
 Female Ref
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic white Ref
 Non-Hispanic black 1.6 (0.9–2.9) .14
 Hispanic 1.3 (0.7–2.2) .40
 Other 2.1 (1.2–3.7) .01
Current annual household income
 <$20,000 1.6 (1.2–2.3) .005
 $20,000–$39,999 1.4 (1.0–1.9) .07
 $40,000–$59,999 1.0 (0.7–1.4) .84
 $60,000+ Ref
Chronic disease status
 Grade 3–4 0.5 (0.3–0.6) <.001
 Grade 1–2 0.7 (0.5–0.9) .004
 Grade 0 Ref
Education
 <High school 2.5 (1.6–3.8) <.001
 High school 2.0 (1.5–2.7) <.001
 College graduate Ref
*

n = 2,965 general care at baseline, 2,515 survivor-focused care at baseline; among them 348 became no care.

Age at diagnosis, years since diagnosis, gender, race, insurance, income, education, ever had a job, general health, anxiety due to cancer, physical limitation, cancer pain, emotional health, chronic disease status, RT status, alkylating agent score, and anthracycline dose are all candidates of the model. Backward selection resulted in a model containing only the variables shown in the table.

At baseline, the severity of chronic health conditions reported by participants was scored according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events version 3.

§

Results from analyses were adjusted using IPW to account for potential bias due to nonparticipation.