Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015 Feb 20;45(5):614–631. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1004678

Table 4.

Importance Scores for MIN, Individual PT, and Group PT Segments

Segment
F Dunnett’s C g
MIN (n = 97) IPT(n = 260) GPT (n = 86)

R1 M (SD) R M (SD) R M (SD)
Process Attributes
Group and phone support 1 7.4 (2.5) 13 4.7 (2.1) 10 5.0 (1.8) 57.27*** M > I, G 1.25
Modality of information 2 7.3 (1.9) 11 4.8 (2.2) 16 3.7 (1.7) 77.36*** M > I > G 1.21
Pull vs. pushing information 3 6.4 (2.3) 17 4.0 (1.8) 15 3.9 (1.4) 64.38*** M >I, G 1.29
Group size 5 6.1 (2.4) 7 5.6 (2.1) 18 3.2 (1.5) 51.66** M, I > G 0.24
Location of information 6 5.5 (2.2) 12 4.7 (2.1) 13 4.2 (2.2) 9.09*** M > I, G 0.38
Passive vs. active learning materials 15 4.1 (1.5) 15 4.5 (1.5) 8 5.5 (1.4) 22.50*** G > I, M −0.27
Timing of Information 16 4.1 (1.7) 10 4.8 (1.4) 14 3.9 (1.3) 17.37*** I > M, G −0.49
Recommendation 17 3.9 (1.4) 16 4.5 (1.6) 12 4.3 (1.4) 4.11* I, G > M −0.34
Content selection process 19 3.6 (1.5) 18 3.5 (1.4) 17 3.2 (1.3) 1.9 NS 0.07
Time demand to acquire and use 20 3.0 (1.3) 19 3.4 (1.3) 19 2.8 (1.1) 6.04** M, I > G −0.26
Content Attributes
Emotional problems 7 5.5 (2.4) 2 6.6 (2.1) 2 7.9 (1.8) 28.17*** G > I > M −0.51
Behavior problems 8 5.3 (2.0) 3 6.2 (2.0) 1 7.9 (1.6) 45.88*** G > I > M −0.48
Information on epidemiology 9 5.3 (2.0) 9 5.3 (1.5) 9 5.2 (1.5) .21 NS 0.21
Advocacy 12 4.5 (1.8) 8 5.4 (1.7) 5 6.4 (1.5) 27.47*** G > I > M −0.52
Medication information 13 4.3 (1.6) 14 4.5 (1.7) 11 4.6 (1.8) .81 NS −0.12
Specificity/relevance 14 4.2 (1.5) 20 3.3 (1.4) 20 2.7 (1.2) 30.28*** M > I > G 0.68
Supporting evidence base 18 3.9 (1.8) 6 5.6 (1.6) 7 5.7 (1.3) 48.08*** I, G > M −1.11
Outcome Attributes
Effect on stress, anxiety, and guilt 4 6.1 (1.7) 5 5.9 (1.9) 6 6.3 (1.9) 1.39 NS 0.10
Effect on feeling informed 10 4.9 (1.7) 1 6.7 (1.9) 3 6.9 (1.8) 41.45*** I, G > M −0.86
Effect on confidence 11 4.7 (1.6) 4 6.1 (1.7) 4 6.8 (1.4) 39.20*** G > I > M −0.84

Note. Means, standard deviations, and F-values obtained from analysis of variance (ANOVA). When significant results were obtained, Dunnett’s C comparisons were computed and the results were reported here. Across segments, the highest importance score for an attribute is bolded.

1

R = relative rank of importance scores within each segment. MIN = Minimal Information; IPT = Individual PT; GPT = Group PT. M = Minimal Information; I=Individual parent training; G=Group parent training For g, .2 < g < .5 indicates a small effect, while .5 < g < .8 indicates a moderate effect and .8 < g < 1.0 indicates a large effect.

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001