Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 22.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Chem. 2013 Oct 23;60(2):307–322. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.209676

Table 1.

Advantages, limitations, and knowledge gaps in key aspects of OF drug testing.

Advantages Limitations Knowledge gaps
OF collection Easy, noninvasive; no need for privacy; sex neutral Between- and within-device variability in drug recovery, stability, volume collected; dry mouth reduces OF volume; stimulation can affect test results Establish a standardized procedure for sample collection
OF analysis Basic drugs concentrate in OF; parent drug frequently present Few stability data; low volume compared to urine; possible instrumentation issue due to OF buffer Need to develop multianalyte LC-MS or GC-MS methods; need stability studies for all doping agents
Substance banned at all times Endogenous steroids and peptide hormones detectable in OF; OF concentrations correlate better with blood than urine Unable to differentiate endogenous production and exogenous contribution; T/E OF irrelevant; enzymatic activity in salivary glands; detection windows may be too short for synthetic steroids Need to provide disposition data for majority of these compounds; evaluation of OF contamination when drugs given by spray; controlled administration studies needed
Substance banned in competition only Several agents already extensively studied in OF; short detection windows; OF concentrations correlate well with blood Weak bases sensitive to OF pH change; enzymatic activity in salivary glands for glucocorticosteroids Need synthetic glucocorticosteroid data; evaluation of OF contamination when drugs given by spray (other than cannabinoids); controlled administration studies needed