Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2015 Aug 1;83(9):1720–1732. doi: 10.1002/prot.24857

Table II.

Correlation between structural similarity scores

β-barrels
RMSD TM-score GDT_HA GDT_TS AL0 AL4 CAD

α-helical proteins RMSD -0.48 -0.37 -0.43 -0.44 -0.56 -0.42
TM-score -0.60 0.88 0.94 0.96 0.86 0.90
GDT_HA -0.60 0.85 0.98 0.93 0.76 0.97
GDT_TS -0.57 0.91 0.98 0.98 0.86 0.97
AL0 -0.60 0.92 0.90 0.96 0.90 0.93
AL4 -0.67 0.91 0.68 0.79 0.83 0.79
CAD -0.56 0.79 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.71

Pearson’s correlation coefficients (PCC) between structural similarity scores were calculated for a set of homology models of β-barrels (upper right), or α-helical proteins (lower left). RMSD and TM-score values are optimized in several of the structure alignment methods, whereas GDT, AL and CAD scores are used for assessment. Entries in bold indicate scores that are highly correlated with each other (PCC >0.9). Note that the RMSD values are negatively correlated with all other scores, because the RMSD has a maximum value of zero, whereas all other scores are inverted and rescaled to have a maximal value of 1.