Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 19;16:146. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0141-2

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics at the time of transplantation

Variable No-induction rATG Basiliximab P value
Number 19 24 17
Gender (M/F) 9/10 16/8 9/8 ns
Recipient age (years)* 57 [27; 70] 54 [21; 78] 53 [25; 65] ns
Donor age (years)* 52 [16; 68] 46 [18; 74] 61 [21; 75] <0.05‡a
HLA MM* 3 [2; 6] 3 [1; 5] 3 [2; 5] ns
1st/2nd and 3rd KTx (n) 19/0 11/13§ 16/1 <0.0001
PRA (%)* 4 [0; 22] 68 [0; 96] 6 [2; 63] <0.0001‡b
CNI (TAC/CsA) (n) 21/4 28/0 18/0 ns
CIT (hours)* 16.2 [11.0; 20.7] 15.4 [7.7; 20.1] 17.2 [7.7; 21.0] ns
Dialysis time (years)* 2.0 [0.2; 5.7] 1.9 [0.5; 6.4] 2.0 [0.6; 4.9] ns
Cause of renal failure ns
 Primary GN 9 9 4
 Hereditary diseases 2 5 4
 Diabetic or ischemic nephropathy 6 2 7
 TIN 2 1 1
 ANCA vasculitis or lupus nephritis 0 4 0
 Other causes 0 3 1

ANCA Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, CIT cold ischemic time, CNI calcineurin inhibitor, CsA cyclosporine A, GN glomerulonephritis, HLA MM HLA mismatch, PRA historical panel-reactive antibodies, measured every 3 months before transplantation (the highest number in each patient was considered), TAC tacrolimus, TIN tubulointerstitial nephritis, TxR renal transplantation

*Median [min; max]; Chi square test P value; Kruskal-Wallis test P value

Dunn's Multiple Comparison Test: aSignificant difference between the basiliximab group and the rATG group and a bsignificant difference between rATG and the no-induction or basiliximab group

§2 patients had a 3rd transplantation