Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 4;16:130. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0122-5

Table 2.

Association between two-fold higher baseline plasma Lp(a) levels and eGFR decline

Analysis eGFR decline, ml/min/1.73 m2 (95 % CI) P-Value
Model 1 −0.83 (−0.97, −0.70) <0.001
Model 2 −0.51 (−0.65, −0.37) <0.001
Model 3 −0.50 (−0.64, −0.36) <0.001

Data represent eGFR change per year for every two-fold higher plasma Lp(a) concentration, analyzed as a continuous variable. Regression through mixed effects modeling was performed in incremental models with the following co-variates

Model 1: Age, gender, race, baseline SCr

Model 2: Age, gender, race, baseline SCr, BMI, hypertension, lipid-lowering medications, smoking, alcohol use, hemoglobin A1c

Model 3: Age, gender, race, baseline SCr, BMI, hypertension, lipid-lowering medications, smoking, alcohol use, hemoglobin A1c, urinary ACR

*Definition of hypertension includes the use of anti-hypertensive medications

SCr serum creatinine, ACR albumin to creatinine ratio