Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 21;15:361. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1084-8

Table 4.

Relative likelihood of TB final diagnosis expressed as hazard ratios using cox regression analysis

Steps to diagnosis Days to diagnosis
Characteristics Total (%) Unadjusted HR (95 % CI) Adjusted HR (95 % CI) Unadjusted HR (95 % CI) Adjusted HR (95 % CI)
Age category
18–24 74 (25) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
25–34 108 (37) 0.89 (0.66,1.19) 0.82 (0.60,1.11) 0.97 (0.72,1.30) 0.81 (0.59,1.10)
35–44 71 (24.3) 0.91 (0.66,1.26) 0.72 (0.50,1.03) 0.96 (0.69,1.34) 0.88 (0.59,1.16)
≥45 41 (13.7) 1.48 (1.11,2.16) 1.37 (0.92,2.04) 1.70 (1.15,2.50) 1.14 (0.77,1.68)
Sex
Female 124 (41.3) 1.00 - 1.00 -
Male 170 (58.7) 1.07 (0.85.1.35) 1.19 (0.94.1.51)
Marital status
Never married 103 (35) 1.00 - 1.00 -
Currently married 106 (36.7) 0.83 (0.64,1.09) 0.76 (0.58,1.00)
Previously married 85 (28.3) 1.08 (0.81,1.44) 0.97 (0.74,1.33)
Employment
Yes 244 (83.3) 1.00 - 1.00 -
No 50 (16.7) 0.84 (0.62,1.14) 0.87 (0.64,1.19)
Mobile phone ownership
Yes 237 (81) 1.00 - 1.00 -
No 57 (19) 1.16 (0.87,1.55) 1.07 (0.79,1.43)
TB treatment category
Retreatment 70 (23.7) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
New 224 (76.3) 0.59 (0.45,0.78)* 0.66 (0.49,0.88)* 0.62 (0.47,0.81)* 0.70 (0.52–0.93)*
HIV status
Positive 96 (32.7) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Negative 184 (62.7) 0.84 (0.66,1.11) 0.88 (0.67–1.15) 0.77 (0.60–0.96) 0.70 (0.53–0.92)*
Don’t know 14 (4.6) 0.85 (0.49,1.49) 0.95 (0.54–1.68) 0.85 (0.47–1.52) 1.23 (0.68–2.33)
First contacted place/person
Social 171 (58) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
TB care provider 36 (12) 0.99 (0.69,1.42) 1.08 (0.75,1.57) 0.88 (0.62,1.27) 0.89 (0.62,1.29)
Non-TB care provider 87 (30) 0.65 (0.50,0.85)* 0.72 (0.55,0.95)* 0.71 (0.55,0.92)* 0.50 (0.40,0.70)*

*significant at p < 0.05