Table. 4.

Results of logistic regression models predicting awareness of alcohol warning labels

	It is safest not to drink while pregnanta		Is your drinking harming yourself or others?		Kids and alcohol don’t mix
	OR (95 % CI)	p	OR (95 % CI)	p	OR (95 % CI)	p
Gender
Male	1.00		1.00		1.00
Female	1.22 (0.78–1.90)	.391	0.77 (0.44–1.34)	.350	0.58 (0.29–1.16)	.125
Age	Wald χ 2 p < .001		Wald χ 2 p = .026		Wald χ 2 p = .004
18–24	1.00		1.00		1.00
25–34	0.97 (0.56–1.64)	.873	0.56 (0.29–1.11)	.096	0.40 (0.19–0.84)	.016
35–45	0.31 (0.18–0.54)	<.001	0.41 (0.21–0.78)	.007	0.29 (0.14–0.60)	.001
Education
Less than tertiary	1.00		1.00		1.00
Tertiary or above	0.95 (0.62–1.46)	.818	1.57 (0.92–2.68)	.095	1.97 (1.02–3.84)	.045
Binge drinking	1.40 (1.13–1.72)	.002	1.55 (1.20–2.00)	.001	1.54 (1.15–2.05)	.004
Main alcoholic drink	Wald χ 2 p = .204		Wald χ 2 p = .250		Wald χ 2 p = .069
Beer	1.00		1.00		1.00
Wine	1.23 (0.70–2.16)	.472	1.72 (0.89–3.31)	.108	2.51 (1.04–6.06)	.041
Spirits	0.88 (0.48–1.61)	.671	1.36 (0.65–2.85)	.418	1.16 (0.42–3.20)	.776
Pre-mix	0.48 (0.24–0.98)	.045	0.63 (0.25–1.59)	.325	0.81 (0.25–2.67)	.740
Cider	0.82 (0.28–2.39)	.718	1.41 (0.34–5.85)	.640	1.38 (0.23–8.20)	.725
Other	0.95 (0.30–2.97)	.929	1.19 (0.31–4.56)	.796	4.22 (1.22–14.68)	.023
Drink directly from can or bottle
Never/not often	1.00		1.00		1.00
At least sometimes	1.75 (1.10–2.77)	.018	2.24 (1.21–4.13)	.010	2.90 (0.93–3.88)	.077
Support for health warning labels
Neutral or opposed	1.00		1.00		1.00
Support/strongly support	2.48 (1.41–4.37)	.002	2.53 (1.25–5.12)	.010	2.65 (1.06–6.60)	.037

^aAwareness of any of the three pregnancy warning labels

Note. Data weighted by age, sex, and state of residence